Presented By:Shoaib Khan Tania Sarkar Suchendra Dixit Shankhadeb Bhattacharya. Proposing Research Many students & some business researchers view the proposal process as unnecessary work. In actuality the more inexperienced a researcher is, the more important it is to have a well-planned & adequately documented proposal.3/5(2) 3/18/ · Bibliography -- lists everything you used or cited in your proposal, with additional citations to any key sources relevant to understanding the research problem. In either case, this section should testify to the fact that you did enough preparatory work to ensure the project will complement and not just duplicate the efforts of other blogger.com: Robert V. Labaree Bibliographies include all the sources you consulted in your research whether or not you cite or mention them at all in your research paper. Your works cited should include only the sources that you cite. Professors will ask for bibliographies when they want to review all the research you conducted to prepare for the paper
Why Bibliography Is Important In Research? - Dr. Vidya Hattangadi
I am making my way through your Research Proposal and Annotated Bibliography assignments and hope to be completed by the end of the day. Please note my comments and use this example to self edit your work. Thank you all. The New Darwinism: Social Capital and Survival of the Fittest in the Canadian Healthcare System. The study of social capital as bibliography in research proposal health determinant is a relatively new field Derose and Varda This theoretical construct has been used to explore everything from adherence in breast cancer screening Moudatsou et al.
With few exceptions, research has focused on the benefits of using social capital to improve access to essential services Derose and Varda At the individual level, the benefits are certainly abundant. However, a bibliography in research proposal nefarious aspect of socially facilitated healthcare access emerges when we consider these ideas in the context of a public healthcare system.
Using Canadian examples, I will argue that social leveraging promotes preferential access to health services that undermine the egalitarian pillars of publicly funded healthcare infrastructure. Social capital describes any interpersonal structure e. trust, group membership that influences a particular outcome e. adherence to medication use; Derose and Varda, Due to the broadness of this definition, several subcategories have been identified for functional application in empirical studies Derose and Varda Linking social capital represents the relationships between individuals within formal institutions e.
law enforcement officers that facilitate the leveraging of resources Derose and Varda, For the purposes of this discussion, I will refer to this type of social capital simply as social leveraging. Unfortunately, as resources become limited due to high demand, individuals may wish to circumvent provisioning policy in an effort to expedite their access.
Drawing on cases of preferential access in Canada, I will show that social leveraging to accelerate care is occurring, and that these actions degrade public perceptions of the Canadian healthcare system Soroka, This proposal also bibliography in research proposal the time to define a central term: social capital; to ensure the reader understands this central concept.
As you review the following Annotated Bibliography below, please note the sentences I have bolded: they are essential elements of an bibliography in research proposal of this sort. Here is a description of what those sentences do in an annotation:. These are the elements that are expected in annotations of this sort.
If you are missing these aspects, you should spend some time now editing bibliography in research proposal improving your annotations. You will find that your annotations are quite helpful for when you are ready to draft your papers. Moudatsou, Maria M, bibliography in research proposal, Kritsotakis, George, Alegakis, Athanasios K, Koutis, Antonios, and Philalithis, bibliography in research proposal, Anastasios E.
In their research article, Moudatsou et al. investigate the relationship between social capital and 1 knowledge of cancer bibliography in research proposal services, and 2 adherence to screening guidelines, among women in Greece.
Using a cross-sectional approach, the researchers evaluated social capital in two dimensions: cognitive and structural. Cognitive social capital includes feelings or perceptions of relationships, and measures indices such as bibliography in research proposal and reciprocity.
Structural social capital includes formalized participation in group activities, and measures indices such as civic engagement and membership with clubs. As the article discusses, this distinction is important because health outcomes are often associated with one dimension to a greater extent than the other.
By treating the cognitive and structural dimensions of social capital separately in statistical analyses, researchers can determine which aspect of social capital is most significant to the outcome variable. With this in mind, bibliography in research proposal, Moudatsou et al. concluded that cognitive aspects of social capital were predictive of knowledge of screening services among participants, and cognitive and structural dimensions were predictive of adherence to screening guidelines.
This article is useful to my essay because it highlights bibliography in research proposal importance of differentiating between subcategories of social capital in academic analysis. With these considerations in mind, I have refined the approach of my essay to specifically examine social leveraging a form of structural, linking social capital.
The limitations section of this article highlights the fact that social capital is subjective, so conclusions drawn are population-specific. Therefore, I will focus on social leveraging as a determinant of access to health services within a Canadian context. The Moudatsou et al. Therefore, it can be regarded as a high-quality academic resource. Soroka, Stuart N. Canadian Perceptions of the Health Care System: A Report to the Health Council of Canada. Health Council of Canada, Feb.
The aim of this report was to evaluate how Canadians view the performance of the healthcare system and its governance. To access public opinions, Soroka compiled data obtained by several private research groups between Participants were asked to comment on many issues, such as spending, privatization, and areas most in need of improvement, bibliography in research proposal. Based on these data, the author provides a succinct overview of predominant perceptions.
He compares public opinion data against various measures of health delivery performance e. average wait time for surgery in order to assess the accuracy of these beliefs.
In addition, Soroka discusses the current state of healthcare policy from a government perspective, and provides recommendations for improvement that coincide with public priorities.
While the data indicates that Canadians are firmly in favor of publicly funded infrastructure, concerns about timely access to services and quality of care are pervasive. Strikingly, the pessimistic views held by Canadians concerning wait times appear to be an accurate reflection of the bibliography in research proposal state of healthcare delivery.
Of particular interest is the overarching pessimism regarding access to services and wait times, and the validation of these concerns when compared against health performance metrics. The conclusions drawn in this report are based on empirical evidence collected by independent, scholarly consultants.
Soroka is transparent regarding the limitations of this report e. cross-sectional approach, representativeness of populations sampledwhich helps to dispel concerns of bias. However, because this report was commissioned and published by government representatives, caution is warranted when considering the findings.
Vertes, John Z. Health Services Preferential Access Inquiry — Alberta. Alberta Health Services, 21 Aug. In his report on suspected preferential access to publicly funded healthcare services, Vertes provides a cross-sectional analysis of the use of social leveraging to expedite access to high-demand health resources in Alberta.
Vertes starts by introducing why the inquiry is needed: growing public concern about misconduct within the healthcare system that is allowing for inequitable access to services. He contextualizes the discussion by providing a set of definitions, ethical expectations of the physician, and healthcare system caveats. With this framework established, Vertes investigates several allegations of preferential access, using testimony from witnesses, and review of exhibits.
Of the 9 classifications of cases examined, Vertes finds evidence of misconduct or potential for misconduct in all of them. He concludes the inquiry by providing a list of recommendations and future initiatives for Alberta Health Services to adopt in order to prevent preferential access e.
This document is helpful because it provides a Canadian context for understanding the use of bibliography in research proposal leveraging as a means of securing access to limited resources in a high-demand healthcare system. The case studies are particularly valuable because they not only describe incidences of preferential access via employment of social capital, but each case is accompanied by a description of the underlying problems in the Albertan and by extension, Canadian healthcare system that precipitate misconduct.
Although this is a scholarly piece of writing, it was commissioned by a government body and is likely biased in its conclusions, bibliography in research proposal.
Several sections give indication of bias, such as the investigation into MLA advocacy. It is suspicious that so little evidence is presented indicating misconduct amongst government officials.
Additionally, a disclaimer that nefarious activities occurred before the establishment of Alberta Health Services often accompanies evidence of misconduct, thereby absolving elected officials of blame.
Thus, caution is warranted when incorporating these ideas into my paper. Zhang, Licheng, Wang, Hong, Wang, Lushang, and Hsiao, William. In their research study, Zhang et al. examined willingness to join a community-based health insurance program in a representative sample of rural Chinese agriculturalists. The aim of this study was to determine how many individuals would be interested in participating in a community-based health insurance program, and what factors might influence this decision.
To explore these questions, the authors employed a social capital conceptual framework. Measures of trust and reciprocity were taken at the individual and community level, and used as independent variables to assess willingness to join the insurance program in statistical analyses. The authors found that greater perceptions of trust and reciprocity were positively correlated with willingness to contribute to a community-based health initiative. Findings from this study were used to inform local healthcare policy.
This article provides a detailed example of how social capital theory has been applied in empirical studies to examine questions of access to health services. In particular, the background provides an excellent description of how assessing social capital can add insight into healthcare decision-making processes at the individual and community level. The Zhang et al. study was published in a scholarly, peer-reviewed journaland does not appear to demonstrate biases, bibliography in research proposal.
You are commenting using your WordPress. com account. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email, bibliography in research proposal.
English Online. Skip to content. Home About Course Schedule Guidelines for Discussion Forums Guidelines for Response Journal Entries. Good Day I am making my way through your Research Proposal and Annotated Bibliography assignments and hope to be completed by the end of the day, bibliography in research proposal.
Explain why the document is useful for your research : This article is useful to my essay because it highlights the importance of … Evaluate the document: The Moudatsou et al.
Annotated Bibliography: Moudatsou, Maria M, Kritsotakis, George, Alegakis, Athanasios K, Koutis, Antonios, and Moudatsou, Maria M, Kritsotakis, George, Alegakis, Athanasios K, Koutis, Antonios, and Philalithis, Anastasios E.
How to Write a Literature Review: 3 Minute Step-by-step Guide - Scribbr ��
, time: 3:05Writing a Research Plan and Bibliography for a Proposal | Academic Coaching
7/11/ · Writing a Research Plan and Bibliography for a Proposal In the final sections of your proposal you show the plan for your research, give a timeline, and show the reading you’ve already done and still plan to do Presented By:Shoaib Khan Tania Sarkar Suchendra Dixit Shankhadeb Bhattacharya. Proposing Research Many students & some business researchers view the proposal process as unnecessary work. In actuality the more inexperienced a researcher is, the more important it is to have a well-planned & adequately documented proposal.3/5(2) A r esearch proposal is a document written by a researcher that provides a detailed description of. the pr oposed pr ogram. It is like an outline of the entire research process that gives a reader
No comments:
Post a Comment